Work

The Anglo-American Dispute About the 1906 Trial of Daniel Flickinger Wilberforce for Cannibalism

Public Deposited

Downloadable Content


MLA citation style (9th ed.)

Smith, Timothy O. The Anglo-american Dispute About the 1906 Trial of Daniel Flickinger Wilberforce for Cannibalism. . 2021. huntington.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/2966b572-b8ae-48a9-b882-62f13072f11b.

APA citation style (7th ed.)

S. T. O. (2021). The Anglo-American Dispute About the 1906 Trial of Daniel Flickinger Wilberforce for Cannibalism. https://huntington.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/2966b572-b8ae-48a9-b882-62f13072f11b

Chicago citation style (CMOS 17, author-date)

Smith, Timothy O. The Anglo-American Dispute About the 1906 Trial of Daniel Flickinger Wilberforce for Cannibalism. 2021. https://huntington.hykucommons.org/concern/generic_works/2966b572-b8ae-48a9-b882-62f13072f11b.

Note: These citations are programmatically generated and may be incomplete.

The accusation of cannibalism against the African born, American educated, Church of the United Brethren in Christ missionary, and Paramount Chief of the Imperri in Sierra Leone, Daniel Flickinger Wilberforce, has long fascinated scholars from multiple academic disciplines including anthropology, colonial and postcolonial literature, history, and missiology. Despite such attention, the current paper contemplates a hitherto unconsidered aspect of the 1906 Wilberforce trial: his status as a naturalised American citizen. In this context, the Wilberforce trial quickly became the centre of an Anglo-American fracas concerning both its location and its perception of fairness towards a foreign national, which thereby challenged the dignity of British colonial rule in Sierra Leone. This paper therefore focusses upon the high-policy sensitivities within London, which went all the way to the very top of the British Foreign Office, as the British establishment wrestled with American perceptions of British fair play, justice, and colonialism, during the early years of the twentieth century.

Creator
Subject
Language
Keyword
Date created
Related URL
Resource type
Source
  • Historical Yearbook, no. 18, 2021, pp. 97-107

Rights statement

Relations

Relations

In Collection:

Items